Which of the following is an effective intervention strategy for at-risk youth?

Mentoring programs and skill-building workshops are recognized as effective intervention strategies for at-risk youth because they provide essential support and resources that foster personal growth and development. These programs typically match youth with adult mentors who can offer guidance, share experiences, and provide a positive role model. This relationship can help instill confidence, improve decision-making skills, and enhance self-esteem among young people facing challenges.

Skill-building workshops complement this by teaching practical skills such as conflict resolution, communication, leadership, and emotional regulation, which empower youth to navigate social dynamics and build resilience. Collectively, these strategies promote a sense of belonging, improve social connections, and encourage positive behavior, which are crucial for preventing negative outcomes often associated with at-risk circumstances.

In contrast, restrictive discipline approaches are often punitive and do not address the underlying issues faced by at-risk youth, while isolation from peer groups can lead to increased feelings of loneliness and alienation, potentially exacerbating their challenges. Standardized testing may not provide the holistic support necessary for these individuals and often fails to account for the wide range of factors influencing their circumstances and abilities.